|
Re: Grid chase 2022
And we all had fun in spite of your opposition.
Get over it, Dave. Your jeremiads are wearing very thin.
And we all had fun in spite of your opposition.
Get over it, Dave. Your jeremiads are wearing very thin.
|
By
Hans Brakob
·
#1698
·
|
|
Re: Grid chase 2022
+ AA6YQ comments below
The Grid Chase was a year long event just like the ARRL Centennial and POTA was before. It is somewhat "strange ' so to say that there has not been another annual event after
+ AA6YQ comments below
The Grid Chase was a year long event just like the ARRL Centennial and POTA was before. It is somewhat "strange ' so to say that there has not been another annual event after
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1697
·
|
|
Re: Grid chase 2022
Hi Gary:
The Grid Chase was a year long event just like the ARRL Centennial and POTA was before. It is somewhat "strange ' so to say that there has not been another annual event after it.
Is there any
Hi Gary:
The Grid Chase was a year long event just like the ARRL Centennial and POTA was before. It is somewhat "strange ' so to say that there has not been another annual event after it.
Is there any
|
By
Angel Santana WP3GW
·
#1696
·
|
|
Re: Grid chase 2022
ARRL, go for it!
Give me a reason to get on the air!
ARRL, go for it!
Give me a reason to get on the air!
|
By
Hans Brakob
·
#1695
·
|
|
Grid chase 2022
Hey ARRL award meisters,
Any chance of reinstating the grid chase next year?
Despite being popular when first run, it was dropped like a hot coal at the end of the year, for some reason.
Hey ARRL award meisters,
Any chance of reinstating the grid chase next year?
Despite being popular when first run, it was dropped like a hot coal at the end of the year, for some reason.
|
By
Gary Hinson <Gary@...>
·
#1694
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
Thanks to all that commented. Good comment on checking how the logging software works with more than one station. I need to check on that. I use N3FJP. For now I'll set up another station location
Thanks to all that commented. Good comment on checking how the logging software works with more than one station. I need to check on that. I use N3FJP. For now I'll set up another station location
|
By
Dale Dean / AF7WH
·
#1693
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
In any case, stop piling on.
+ No one is piling on. No one criticized you. We just corrected the erroneous information you posted.
de AA6YQ
In any case, stop piling on.
+ No one is piling on. No one criticized you. We just corrected the erroneous information you posted.
de AA6YQ
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1692
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
OK, guys. I was wrong, but you know what I meant. He needs to specify a different location, just as I did (guess I don't remember all that well).
In any case, stop piling on. This isn't
OK, guys. I was wrong, but you know what I meant. He needs to specify a different location, just as I did (guess I don't remember all that well).
In any case, stop piling on. This isn't
|
By
Kermit Lehman
·
#1691
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
Dale,
Lots of good comments so far.
One area you need to consider is: How will your logger help you manage your two sets of QSOs? Some loggers make it easy to manage a single log file with QSOs
Dale,
Lots of good comments so far.
One area you need to consider is: How will your logger help you manage your two sets of QSOs? Some loggers make it easy to manage a single log file with QSOs
|
By
Rick Hall - K5GZR
·
#1690
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
The above is not optimal. Any operation in FL under AF7WH should have its own FL certificate. All LoTW confirmations should be correct for the QSO being confirmed.
+ There is no such thing as
The above is not optimal. Any operation in FL under AF7WH should have its own FL certificate. All LoTW confirmations should be correct for the QSO being confirmed.
+ There is no such thing as
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1689
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
AB1J wrote:
The above is not optimal. Any operation in FL under AF7WH should have its own FL certificate. All LoTW confirmations should be correct for the QSO being confirmed.
I think some
AB1J wrote:
The above is not optimal. Any operation in FL under AF7WH should have its own FL certificate. All LoTW confirmations should be correct for the QSO being confirmed.
I think some
|
By
Michael (N1EN)
·
#1688
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
+ The only reason to obtain a second Callsign Certificate would be if the
callsign Dale intends to use over-the-air when making QSOs from his Florida
station is AF7WH/4. If he's going to use AF7WH
+ The only reason to obtain a second Callsign Certificate would be if the
callsign Dale intends to use over-the-air when making QSOs from his Florida
station is AF7WH/4. If he's going to use AF7WH
|
By
Kermit Lehman
·
#1687
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
Required by the BARTG contest organizers, because the US call areas are multipliers.
"Stations in areas that count as multipliers whose callsign does not reflects the correct areamust append the
Required by the BARTG contest organizers, because the US call areas are multipliers.
"Stations in areas that count as multipliers whose callsign does not reflects the correct areamust append the
|
By
Chuck Milam
·
#1686
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ Required by who?
de AA6YQ
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ Required by who?
de AA6YQ
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1685
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
Unless you're entering something like the BARTG RTTY contests, then I'm required to sign as N9KY/4. So, I have a cert for that situation.
Chuck Milam, N9KY
Kentucky Section Technical
Unless you're entering something like the BARTG RTTY contests, then I'm required to sign as N9KY/4. So, I have a cert for that situation.
Chuck Milam, N9KY
Kentucky Section Technical
|
By
Chuck Milam
·
#1684
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
Signing /4 is not required.
+ Agreed. I was responding to Hans K0HB’s “for the benefit of OTHER grid/WAS/county hunters” suggestion.
+ The only way to know exactly where your QSO partner is
Signing /4 is not required.
+ Agreed. I was responding to Hans K0HB’s “for the benefit of OTHER grid/WAS/county hunters” suggestion.
+ The only way to know exactly where your QSO partner is
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1683
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
Signing /4 is not required.
On 11/18/2021 9:34 AM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
Signing /4 is not required.
On 11/18/2021 9:34 AM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
|
By
W0MU
·
#1682
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
Just for the benefit of OTHER grid/WAS/county hunters I would establish
separate certs for each.
+ The only reason to obtain a second Callsign Certificate would be if the
callsign Dale intends to use
Just for the benefit of OTHER grid/WAS/county hunters I would establish
separate certs for each.
+ The only reason to obtain a second Callsign Certificate would be if the
callsign Dale intends to use
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1681
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
I will be living in SW Florida during the winter months (Nov to June). I plan to operate from my QTH in Idaho during the summer months (July thru Oct) and both stations via remote. My question is do
I will be living in SW Florida during the winter months (Nov to June). I plan to operate from my QTH in Idaho during the summer months (July thru Oct) and both stations via remote. My question is do
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1680
·
|
|
Re: 2nd QTH
Just for the benefit of OTHER grid/WAS/county hunters I would establish separate certs for each.
HB
Just for the benefit of OTHER grid/WAS/county hunters I would establish separate certs for each.
HB
|
By
Hans Brakob
·
#1679
·
|