New Message - Testing 1234 Welcome to all ARRL-Awards group participants. 73 Bart Jahnke, W9JJ Moderator ARRL Radiosport Manager

Seems to be working Bart. Bernie Bernie McClenny, W3UR Editor of: The Daily DX (1997-2019) The Weekly DX (2001-2019) How's DX? (1999-2019) Two week trial -

Yes, it seems to be working FB. Steve K2FW

Yes, copy here too. Thanks & 73, Jan Blair WA8RZR

Please copy "five nine in Sparks NV QSL?" [:-) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 10/24/2019 7:06 AM, w9jj@... wrote:

As requested: "five nine in Sparks NV QSL?" [:-) "five nine in Sparks NV QSL?" [:-) "five nine in Sparks NV QSL?" [:-) "five nine in Sparks NV QSL?" [:-) "five nine in Sparks NV QSL?" [:-) "five

Got it. Thanks!

Currently the Worked All Continents award requires paper QSL cards to qualify for the award. What would it take for the IARU to recognize QSLs confirmed by LoTW. LoTW is probably more secure than

Thanks John, yes, I have the same exact question. Jan Blair WA8RZR Get Outlook for Android

Hello John et al, Yes, absolutely, it makes sense to have WAC added as an award that one can apply for via LoTW. In fact, it and a few other awards are on the to-do list. Also on the horizon is a

Much appreciated Bart! Thank you, 73, Jan Blair WA8RZR Get Outlook for Android

OK, how about providing an LoTW API or function that lets [authorized] awards managers submit lists of entrants’ QSOs for validation? If this was available, potentially any award could start

Hi Gary, Thanks for the suggestion. Something we can add to the list for review when developing LoTW 2.0. 73 Bart Jahnke, W9JJ ARRL - Radiosport and Field Services Manager

+ AA6YQ comments below OK, how about providing an LoTW API or function that lets [authorized] awards managers submit lists of entrants’ QSOs for validation? If this was available,

+ AA6YQ comments below Yes, absolutely, it makes sense to have WAC added as an award that one can apply for via LoTW. In fact, it and a few other awards are on the to-do list. Also on the horizon is

This would never work without more hardware and that would mean more cost and that would mean these people would have to be charged. That would be reasonable. The problem is deciding what would be a

+ AA6YQ comments below

You may be right. I have no inside information about the system. It does seem there have been times that people have complained about response but it may have been for other reasons. I was not talking

+ AA6YQ comments below You may be right. I have no inside information about the system. It does seem there have been times that people have complained about response but it may have been for other

+ Agreed. And don’t forget documentation! …. Including the functional specification: what is it meant to achieve (and avoid), ideally in sufficient detail to design, code and test it? Plus