1. once per year. a,b,c - you misunderstand the rule. This location is not your preferred amateur radio remote service provider. Rather, it is a geographical location with a circle TBD. 200km? d.

Good question.  All in the proposal.  To be considered. Steve, N4JQQ, DXAC, Delta

Question? AND Designate one additional location to work DX from and have it count for DXCC. 1. How often can you change this one location? a. What if they go out of business? b. What if they

I was addressing this message Ria, not the 50 mile limit one. Sorry I should have quoted it. 73, Lou W0FK

I quoted 50 miles as an example of what is in an existing ARRL award. It was not intended to set a distance limit for Dave's proposal. I thought I was pretty clear about that. Ria N2RJ

I believe Ria was addressing the Proposed rule relative to Remote Stations. No change to a QSO made anywhere in a DXCC country by the “traditional” method if operator and transmitter are together.

Succinct, reasonable, and fair it seems to me. The distance is a challenge to determine, but seemingly not impossible. IMHO, 50 miles is way too small an area. It takes at least 100-200 to get out

Steve I don't get that one either. I live in Pennsylvania. So if I go on vacation and work P5 from say Nebraska and then go to New Mexico and work BS7H I can only count one of these??? What's up with

And be able to change the additional location once a year????? Steve, N4JQQ

This seems too simplistic a choice. There are issues it does not address. But rather than say them over and over again, I implore the ARRL BoD to convene a task force to develop a proposal(plan for a

Its all well and good to recommend/suggest ideas in this forum.....HOWEVER......what you really need to do is contact your division director and DXAC rep and make your feelings known....

Agreed completely. -- =================== Chuck Chandler chandlerusm@... ===================

Hi Dave, The WAS circle was an example of an award that had a limited area. I did not mean that your proposal had a 50 mile limit. Ria N2RJ

+ AA6YQ comments below AA6YQ's suggestion was: Keep the rules as-is AND Offer a "single location endorsement" that says that you worked all DX from one small circle. This would be similar to WAS

AA6YQ's suggestion should be the one DXAC approves and sends to the board for their approval. Barry

AA6YQ nailed it. Simple solution which preserves the valid and legitimate interests of the conservatives and purists, yet doesn’t impose arbitrary restrictions on others. 73, de Hans,

Summary: Current rule: Add to your DXCC totals from anywhere within the DXCC entity. So you can work from Maine, and work DX that is favorable out East and then log in to a station in Western

To paraphrase President Clinton during a difficult time in his life, "That depends on what your definition of 'well' is." Traffic handling, in the sense of NTS in mid-20th century, is

and, many who might have an opinion one way or another may not be subscribed to ARRL Awards email or otherwise be unaware of the changes being considered? The commentary here is

Thanks Ria, We sometimes lose the focus of the mission of the ARRL. Whatever our biases. I don’t know the real numbers, but it could be that the majority of the youth of today just aren’t