AA6YQ's suggestion should be the one DXAC approves and sends to the board for their approval. Barry

AA6YQ nailed it. Simple solution which preserves the valid and legitimate interests of the conservatives and purists, yet doesn’t impose arbitrary restrictions on others. 73, de Hans,

Summary: Current rule: Add to your DXCC totals from anywhere within the DXCC entity. So you can work from Maine, and work DX that is favorable out East and then log in to a station in Western

To paraphrase President Clinton during a difficult time in his life, "That depends on what your definition of 'well' is." Traffic handling, in the sense of NTS in mid-20th century, is

and, many who might have an opinion one way or another may not be subscribed to ARRL Awards email or otherwise be unaware of the changes being considered? The commentary here is

Thanks Ria, We sometimes lose the focus of the mission of the ARRL. Whatever our biases. I don’t know the real numbers, but it could be that the majority of the youth of today just aren’t

Just on a completely different topic - ARRL is keen on de-emphasizing the "Radio Relay League" connotation. This was in the works since Kay Craigie was President. Why? Most people, including most

+ AA6YQ comments below+ Amateur radio encompasses a broad range of interests and activities. This online group was recently established to facilitate discussions about ARRL-sponsored awards, all of

My comment to Dave and Val is admittedly not focused on the precise topic at hand, so I am out of line making it, here. But I'll ask forgiveness, rather for permission! It's not really my place to

* more AA6YQ comments below + Changing the specifications of the replacement DXCC system to accommodate "DXCC/R" is that last thing that project needs at this point in time. The first rule of

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

+ AA6YQ comments below I would like to see an addition/modification to the DXCC program to include a new DXCC/R. Details could be worked out to parallel then new paradigm shift we face. + Sadly,

Many of us do not comment here....we simply communicate with our own director and dxac rep.....

Agreed, This is not a trial where one must present evidence. God help us if we had to prove some of the assertions some have made….especially some of the vague comparisons of apples and Oranges.

Or it could be another reason. On 8/11/2020 4:03 PM, Ria, N2RJ wrote:

Like the symbol rate discussions there are one or two people who dominate the postings and people would rather not get in the middle of it. That’s probably why you aren’t seeing more

I think those that say propagation hopping is happening frequently and apparently ruining the award should provide facts not hearsay. Why are the big names behind this STILL hiding

This is an unscientific poll. There has also been a call to action by one of the remote services. So I wouldn’t say that 3:1 is truly reflective of the ham radio population. Ria N2RJ

So what if I build 6 of my own remote stations, how is that difference other than the depth of my bank account? 73, Lin

Yes is seems so and seems arbitrary. and from my own experiments propagation does not vary on >17m inside a 500km radius, but <12m it varries greatly inside a 50km area. 73, Lin PS as a DXAC member I