|
Re: 5 Band Plaque Legacy (wooden) $85.00
Terrific Dwight!!
Kudos to the Awards Department!
Dale K8TS
Terrific Dwight!!
Kudos to the Awards Department!
Dale K8TS
|
By
K8TS
·
#1958
·
|
|
Re: 5 Band Plaque Legacy (wooden) $85.00
Congrats Dwight!
I wonder: is there any word on whether they will do the same for the 5BWAS and DXCC Challenge plaques?
--
Michael Adams| mda@...
Congrats Dwight!
I wonder: is there any word on whether they will do the same for the 5BWAS and DXCC Challenge plaques?
--
Michael Adams| mda@...
|
By
Michael (N1EN)
·
#1957
·
|
|
Re: 5 Band Plaque Legacy (wooden) $85.00
Even if it is faux wood, it looks so much nicer than the acrylic one. And it has a date and number on it.
73,
Mike W9MR
Even if it is faux wood, it looks so much nicer than the acrylic one. And it has a date and number on it.
73,
Mike W9MR
|
By
W9MR Mike
·
#1956
·
|
|
Re: 5 Band Plaque Legacy (wooden) $85.00
Congrats Dwight! See you in September!
Bernie McClenny, W3UR
Editor of: The Daily DX (1997-2022)
The Weekly DX (2001-2022)
How's DX? (1999-2022)
Two week trial -
Congrats Dwight! See you in September!
Bernie McClenny, W3UR
Editor of: The Daily DX (1997-2022)
The Weekly DX (2001-2022)
How's DX? (1999-2022)
Two week trial -
|
By
W3UR Bernie McClenny
·
#1955
·
|
|
5 Band Plaque Legacy (wooden) $85.00
Awards group are listening. They have added an optional 5BDXCC plaque to the order form. It looks wooden but is man made. It is still much much nicer than the other plastic plaques I have received.
Awards group are listening. They have added an optional 5BDXCC plaque to the order form. It looks wooden but is man made. It is still much much nicer than the other plastic plaques I have received.
|
By
K9QJ
·
#1954
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
Furthermore, Ria, your claim posted here that "LoTW has some serious underlying problems which makes adding additional awards/events problematic." is also false:
1. Starting in 2013, LoTW was
Furthermore, Ria, your claim posted here that "LoTW has some serious underlying problems which makes adding additional awards/events problematic." is also false:
1. Starting in 2013, LoTW was
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1953
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
I didn't post a personal insult, you took it as that.
+ Declaring me to be the master of inanity is a personal insult.
A personal insult is you telling others you'd short the stock of my employer
I didn't post a personal insult, you took it as that.
+ Declaring me to be the master of inanity is a personal insult.
A personal insult is you telling others you'd short the stock of my employer
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1952
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
I didn't post a personal insult, you took it as that. A personal
insult is you telling others you'd short the stock of my employer
because you thought I was a terrible programmer (which is
I didn't post a personal insult, you took it as that. A personal
insult is you telling others you'd short the stock of my employer
because you thought I was a terrible programmer (which is
|
By
Ria, N2RJ
·
#1951
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
Sigh, will everyone please get the terminology correct! The League is all the members. We are the League. HQ is the tireless staff who does the daily business of the League.
So if you have an
Sigh, will everyone please get the terminology correct! The League is all the members. We are the League. HQ is the tireless staff who does the daily business of the League.
So if you have an
|
By
Pete W1RM <w1rm@...>
·
#1950
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
Open governance doesn't mean I should just subject myself to people taking shots at the League at me.
+ The League exists to serve its members. If you are unwilling to hear civil criticism of the
Open governance doesn't mean I should just subject myself to people taking shots at the League at me.
+ The League exists to serve its members. If you are unwilling to hear civil criticism of the
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1949
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
IF there is a designated contact, then that contact SHOULD participate…..IF they dont, then they SHOULD NOT be the designated contact……
IF there is a designated contact, then that contact SHOULD participate…..IF they dont, then they SHOULD NOT be the designated contact……
|
By
Jamie WW3S
·
#1948
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
Open governance doesn't mean I should just subject myself to people taking shots at the League at me.
I have plenty of places where I communicate with members openly and I do it all the time.
But as
Open governance doesn't mean I should just subject myself to people taking shots at the League at me.
I have plenty of places where I communicate with members openly and I do it all the time.
But as
|
By
Ria, N2RJ
·
#1947
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
Ria (and any other League staff and volunteers lurking here),
The “membership” didn’t establish these email lists. They were initiated by a Board action with the mission of providing more
Ria (and any other League staff and volunteers lurking here),
The “membership” didn’t establish these email lists. They were initiated by a Board action with the mission of providing more
|
By
HH Brakob
·
#1946
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
+ AA6YQ comments below
I ask myself what �protracted criticism� really means, and why would it be censored. Having done considerable public speaking to large groups (audiences exceeding 100) in
+ AA6YQ comments below
I ask myself what �protracted criticism� really means, and why would it be censored. Having done considerable public speaking to large groups (audiences exceeding 100) in
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1945
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
I basically slowed down my participation in these forums for two reasons.
1. Someone else posted that they don't respond because I always
respond first. So I slowed down to give others a chance to
I basically slowed down my participation in these forums for two reasons.
1. Someone else posted that they don't respond because I always
respond first. So I slowed down to give others a chance to
|
By
Ria, N2RJ
·
#1944
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
Greetings.
I ask myself what “protracted criticism” really means, and why would it be censored. Having done considerable public speaking to large groups (audiences exceeding 100) in the past, I
Greetings.
I ask myself what “protracted criticism” really means, and why would it be censored. Having done considerable public speaking to large groups (audiences exceeding 100) in the past, I
|
By
K8TS
·
#1943
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
+ AA6YQ comments below
Thanks for posting…here’s the phrase that should mean that ARRL staff monitor and participate in each of these Forums:
“The new groups are aimed at enhancing
+ AA6YQ comments below
Thanks for posting…here’s the phrase that should mean that ARRL staff monitor and participate in each of these Forums:
“The new groups are aimed at enhancing
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#1942
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
versus a Phone call maybe use the newer Email reflector that IS being monitored
and ask nicely :)
https://groups.arrl.org/g/FeedbacktoARRL/topics
Steve
KG5VK
Steven Lott Smith
Tele 318-470-9806
ARRL
versus a Phone call maybe use the newer Email reflector that IS being monitored
and ask nicely :)
https://groups.arrl.org/g/FeedbacktoARRL/topics
Steve
KG5VK
Steven Lott Smith
Tele 318-470-9806
ARRL
|
By
Steven Lott Smith KG5VK ARRL NTX SM
·
#1941
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
I'd call them and ask them.
Steve, N4JQQ
On 5/2/2022 7:52 AM, Frank K4FMH wrote:
I'd call them and ask them.
Steve, N4JQQ
On 5/2/2022 7:52 AM, Frank K4FMH wrote:
|
By
Steven Rutledge <steven.t.rutledge@...>
·
#1940
·
|
|
Re: Challenge certificate
Dave,
Thanks for posting…here’s the phrase that should mean that ARRL staff monitor and participate in each of these Forums:
“The new groups are aimed at enhancing communication among ARRL
Dave,
Thanks for posting…here’s the phrase that should mean that ARRL staff monitor and participate in each of these Forums:
“The new groups are aimed at enhancing communication among ARRL
|
By
Frank K4FMH
·
#1939
·
|