Re: Proposed Changes to DXCC for Remote Stations - Charge to DXAC


While I fully support the RHR group.  I have zero ownership interest and I am not one of their customers or members.  I am not a customer of any of  the remote "companies" or clubs that available today.

I do find it odd that the ARRL and or board members  seem to target one particular group again.


On 8/8/2020 11:37 AM, Ria, N2RJ wrote:


Since you publicly accused me of lying - I will respond publicly.

I am not accusing you personally of this. However, it is a fact that
the CEO of one of the remote services posted a call to action on his
personal facebook page, and linked to this group. He later took it
down, but it was there. That is a fact.

Ria, N2RJ

On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 at 13:34, Jack Roberts - KD9OPV <kd9opv@...> wrote:
Ria N2RJ,

I’m not entirely sure what you’re trying to do by claiming that we’re brigading this group. I know for a fact that none of us were told to come here and post, the link to this group was posted in our discord because it directly pertains to us and how we operate.  and we came here on our own accord to voice our opinions about this proposal. It’s incredibly unprofessional to claim that our opinions do not make an accurate response because we’re a part of RHR.

As for N4JQQ, the proposal literally makes it so that you cannot use more than one RHR station to earn a DXCC, so your message is false. Please reread the proposal.

Jack, KD9OPV

Join to automatically receive all group messages.