Re: Proposed Changes to DXCC for Remote Stations - Charge to DXAC


Steven Rutledge <steven.t.rutledge@...>
 

Hi Dave.  I'm reading every one of the comments.  It is frustrating to me to see that many of those who are commenting haven't even read or have failed to understand the proposal.  I'm neutral at this point.  The DXAC hasn't even decided if they will take this up.  There is nothing in this proposal that says you can't use RHR to DX.  Nothing.  Everyone, please read the proposal again so we can have a cogent discussion.

Steve, N4JQQ, DXAC, Delta

On 8/8/2020 11:25 AM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
These online ARRL groups were explicitly created to facilitate public interaction among hams (ARRL members and non-members), ARRL staff, and ARRL management. The fact that DXAC members and ARRL Directors like Mickey N4MB and Ria N2RJ are participating confirms that the points of view and suggestions posted here are being heard.

One does wonder why the other ARRL Board Members are not participating.

When a decision is made, it would be nice if the rationale behind it were posted here, but we should not expect explanations of why specific recommendations were not adopted; there are too many of them.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ
Ex-Member of the ARRL's prematurely-terminated "Communications with Members" committee.



Join {ARRL-Awards@groups.arrl.org to automatically receive all group messages.