Re: Scarborough Reef
|
W3UR Bernie McClenny
Per DXCC rules:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
5. Deletion Criteria a) An Entity may be deleted from the List if it no longer satisfies the criteria under which it was added. Bernie McClenny, W3UR Editor of: The Daily DX (1997-2020) The Weekly DX (2001-2020) How's DX? (1999-2020) Two week trial - http://www.dailydx.com/free-trial-request/ https://twitter.com/dailydx 410-489-6518 On Oct 29, 2020, at 7:29 PM, Skip <k6dgw@...> wrote:
Me too Dave. The question however is "Why is
BS7 still on the active entity list when it does not meet a
physical requirement to be on that list? Even if someone goes
legally and sets up, it is impossible to find 2 points 100 meters
apart where they and the line between them is permanently above
high tide, unless MSL drops far enough to essentially drain the
lagoon. Keeping it on the active list for "political reasons,"
whatever that means, harks back to before the 2017 Revolution. On the other hand, just because a government prohibits amateur activity, for however long, should not be grounds for moving it to the Deleted List if that entity would otherwise be eligible, no matter how long it has been Unworkium. What counts for "worked 'em all" at any given moment on the other hand is a different question and I suspect that's at the root of much of the discussion. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 10/29/2020 3:30 PM, Dave Cole wrote:
I don't care how small, or how large, if it is on the list, then I want to work it! |
|
|