|
Re: Restrictive covenants
You are a wise person, Ken.
-Fred K1VR
You are a wise person, Ken.
-Fred K1VR
|
By
Fred Hopengarten
·
#40
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
>>>” if there is an actual strategy here then spell it out!”<<<
I was not involved with this in any way so I do not know if this was the reason, but in my related work experience, this tactic is
>>>” if there is an actual strategy here then spell it out!”<<<
I was not involved with this in any way so I do not know if this was the reason, but in my related work experience, this tactic is
|
By
Ken Brown
·
#39
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
> The late filing was intentional, with the knowledge of ALL parties that there was insufficient time for the Bill to advance in the 117th Congress. Even though we knew it would not advance and
> The late filing was intentional, with the knowledge of ALL parties that there was insufficient time for the Bill to advance in the 117th Congress. Even though we knew it would not advance and
|
By
Henry Mensch
·
#38
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
From a strategic point of view, is there anything different with regard to HOA's, since Sen. Bill Nelson refused to move
the Amateur Radio Parity Act forward in late 2016?
From a strategic point of view, is there anything different with regard to HOA's, since Sen. Bill Nelson refused to move
the Amateur Radio Parity Act forward in late 2016?
|
By
Richard C. Bernhardt
·
#37
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
Has this bill been coordinated with the FCC?
Ray
W8LYJ
Has this bill been coordinated with the FCC?
Ray
W8LYJ
|
By
Ray W8LYJ
·
#36
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
"there were many sound reasons for filing it at the end of the Session."
Ok...I'll bite. What would be one of those "sound reasons"?
73,
Gary K9GS
"there were many sound reasons for filing it at the end of the Session."
Ok...I'll bite. What would be one of those "sound reasons"?
73,
Gary K9GS
|
By
Gary K9GS
·
#35
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
Gentlemen
HR9670 was introduced at the request of the ARRL and in cooperation with Cong. Johnson at the end of the 117th Congressional Session.
The late filing was
Gentlemen
HR9670 was introduced at the request of the ARRL and in cooperation with Cong. Johnson at the end of the 117th Congressional Session.
The late filing was
|
By
John Robert Stratton
·
#34
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
Any signs of opposition from the national HOA?
Ray
W8LYJ
Any signs of opposition from the national HOA?
Ray
W8LYJ
|
By
Ray W8LYJ
·
#33
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
The ARRL Legislative Affairs Committee is actively working with Rep. Johnson and others on the bill and yes, we expect that the bill will be re-introduced. Questions may be directed to LAC Chair John
The ARRL Legislative Affairs Committee is actively working with Rep. Johnson and others on the bill and yes, we expect that the bill will be re-introduced. Questions may be directed to LAC Chair John
|
By
David Siddall
·
#32
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
For what reason would it have been introduced just days before the Congress was to end, with no cosponsors as well?
Mike, NE8P
For what reason would it have been introduced just days before the Congress was to end, with no cosponsors as well?
Mike, NE8P
|
By
Mike Polom
·
#31
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
Joe - I am glad you asked this question. I thought that any old business from a previous session carried over to the new Congress. However, according to the Library of Congress web site:
"If a bill
Joe - I am glad you asked this question. I thought that any old business from a previous session carried over to the new Congress. However, according to the Library of Congress web site:
"If a bill
|
By
Wayne, W0ZW
·
#30
·
|
|
Re: Restrictive covenants
Joe - I'm glad you asked that question. I assumed left over business resumed in the new Congress. But from the Library of Congress website:
"If a bill from any Congress does not become law during
Joe - I'm glad you asked that question. I assumed left over business resumed in the new Congress. But from the Library of Congress website:
"If a bill from any Congress does not become law during
|
By
Wayne, W0ZW
·
#29
·
|
|
Restrictive covenants
During the 117th congress Representative Bill Johnson introduced H.R.9670 to adress restrictive covenants for ham radio operators. Anyone have any idea if a similar bill will be introduced during the
During the 117th congress Representative Bill Johnson introduced H.R.9670 to adress restrictive covenants for ham radio operators. Anyone have any idea if a similar bill will be introduced during the
|
By
Joe - KC2J
·
#28
·
|
|
Re: Private land-Use Restrictions
While I don’t know the three options, one solution I offer is remotehams.com.
Clubs are setting up remote bases around the Nation and works so their members can stay on the air. Handihams is one
While I don’t know the three options, one solution I offer is remotehams.com.
Clubs are setting up remote bases around the Nation and works so their members can stay on the air. Handihams is one
|
By
Lloyd Colston, KC5FM
·
#27
·
|
|
Re: Private land-Use Restrictions
Tom N6BT (n6bt.com) has a line of antennas shaped like flowers, dolphins, cactus, etc. I use his N6BT Bravo 5A antenna which is only 9 feet tall and I have over 20,000 QSO's on it. It is very
Tom N6BT (n6bt.com) has a line of antennas shaped like flowers, dolphins, cactus, etc. I use his N6BT Bravo 5A antenna which is only 9 feet tall and I have over 20,000 QSO's on it. It is very
|
By
Tom Fagan
·
#26
·
|
|
Re: Private land-Use Restrictions
Please do not discount those who use VHF. Having an exterior antenna benefits them greatly. I am currently using a copper pipe j-Pole in my upstairs bedroom, and have troubles reaching some repeaters
Please do not discount those who use VHF. Having an exterior antenna benefits them greatly. I am currently using a copper pipe j-Pole in my upstairs bedroom, and have troubles reaching some repeaters
|
By
Tim Rodgers
·
#25
·
|
|
Re: Private land-Use Restrictions
> Twenty-five to 27 percent of the U.S. population now resides
> in a community association...
Yes, and the ratio of those residents to amateur radio licensees is about 100:1. And half of those
> Twenty-five to 27 percent of the U.S. population now resides
> in a community association...
Yes, and the ratio of those residents to amateur radio licensees is about 100:1. And half of those
|
By
Chuck K4RGN
·
#24
·
|
|
Re: Private land-Use Restrictions
To put in perspective how many would be impacted by such a policy the following indicates more than some might imagine.
Twenty-five to 27 percent of the U.S. population now resides in a community
To put in perspective how many would be impacted by such a policy the following indicates more than some might imagine.
Twenty-five to 27 percent of the U.S. population now resides in a community
|
By
Tim Rodgers
·
#23
·
|
|
Re: Private land-Use Restrictions
I, too, have a vertical antenna, but it's buried amongst a bunch of greenery (so as to not offend the HOA's sensibilities) with a minimal radial field. It doesn't work very well.
In my case if ARPA,
I, too, have a vertical antenna, but it's buried amongst a bunch of greenery (so as to not offend the HOA's sensibilities) with a minimal radial field. It doesn't work very well.
In my case if ARPA,
|
By
Mike Polom
·
#22
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Private land-Use Restrictions
I understand your pain. I remember reading PRB 1 and realizing it excluded HOAs. I did have a more reasonable HOA so I got a vertical approved. It helped that the HOA President was a ham.
Ray
W8LYJ
I understand your pain. I remember reading PRB 1 and realizing it excluded HOAs. I did have a more reasonable HOA so I got a vertical approved. It helped that the HOA President was a ham.
Ray
W8LYJ
|
By
Ray W8LYJ
·
#21
·
|